Once a bunch of data has been collected, the raw numbers must be manipulated in some fashion to make them more informative. Several options are available including plotting the data or calculating descriptive statistics
Often, the first thing one does with a set of raw data is to plot frequency distributions. Usually this is done by first creating a table of the frequencies broken down by values of the relevant variable, then the frequencies in the table are plotted in a histogram
Example: Your age as estimated by the questionnaire from the first class
Age |
Frequency |
|
|
|
| 18 |
3 |
| 19 |
10 |
| 20 |
14 |
| 21 |
10 |
| 22 |
5 |
| 23 |
2 |
| 24 |
1 |
| 25 |
1 |
| 26 |
2 |
Note: The frequencies in the above table were calculated by simply counting
the number of subjects having the specified value for the age variable
Plotting is easy when the variable of interest has a relatively small number of values (like our age variable did). However, the values of a variable are sometimes more continuous, resulting in uninformative frequency plots if done in the above manner. For example, our weight variable ranges from 100 lb. to 200 lb. If we used the previously described technique, we would end up with 100 bars, most of which with a frequency less than 2 or 3 (and many with a frequency of zero). We can get around this problem by grouping our values into bins. Try for around 10 bins with natural splits
Example: Binning our weight variable
| Weight Bin |
Midpoint |
Frequency |
|
|
|
|
| 100-109 |
104.5 |
6 |
| 110-119 |
114.5 |
10 |
| 120-129 |
124.5 |
6 |
| 130-139 |
134.5 |
10 |
| 140-149 |
144.5 |
5 |
| 150-159 |
154.5 |
3 |
| 160-169 |
164.5 |
4 |
| 170-179 |
174.5 |
1 |
| 180-189 |
184.5 |
0 |
| 190-199 |
194.5 |
2 |
| 200-209 |
204.5 |
1 |
To change the size of the bin use your mouse to move the little triangle.
see section in text on cumulative frequency distributions Stem & Leaf
Plots
If values of a variable must be grouped prior to creating a frequency plot, then the information related to the specific values becomes lost in the process (i.e., the resulting graph depicts only the frequency values associated with the grouped values). However, it is possible to obtain the graphical advantage of grouping and still keep all of the information if stem & leaf plots are used....
These plots are created by splitting a data point into that part associated with the `group' and that associated with the individual point. For example, the numbers 180, 180, 181, 182, 185, 186, 187, 187, 189 could be represented as:
18 001256779
Thus, we could represent our weight data in the following stem & leaf plot:
10 057788
11 0001235558
12 001555
13 0002244555
14 00005
15 005
16 2255
17 0
18
19 05
20 0
Stem & leaf plots are especially nice for comparing distributions:
Males Stem Females
8 10 05778
11 0001235558
12 001555
5440 13 002255
00 14 005
00 15 5
522 16 5
0 17
18
50 19
0 20
Often, frequency histograms tend to have a roughly symetrical bell-shape and such distributions are called normal or gaussion
Example: Our height distribution
Sometimes, the bell shape is not semetrical
The term positive skew refers to the situation where the "tail" of the distribition is to the right, negative skew is when the "tail" is to the left
Example: Pizza Data
See the text for other terminology
When we describe a set of data corresponding to the values of some variable, we will refer to that set using an uppercase letter such as X or Y
When we want to talk about specific data points within that set, we specify those points by adding a subscript to the uppercase letter like X1
For example:
5, 8, 12, 3, 6, 8, 7
X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, X7
The greek letter sigma, which looks like
,
means "add up" or "sum" whatever follows it. Thus,
,
means "add up all the
Xi's".
If we use the Xis from the previous example, Xi = 49
(or just X)
Note, that sometimes the has number above and below it. These numbers specify the range over which to sum. For example, if we again use the the Xis from the previous example, but now limit the summation: Xi = 34
Antic Real
| Student |
Mark #1 |
Mark #2 |
| - |
X |
Y |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
82 |
84 |
| 2 |
66 |
51 |
| 3 |
70 |
72 |
| 4 |
81 |
56 |
| 5 |
61 |
73 |
Sometimes things are made more complicated because capital letters (e.g., X) are sometimes used to refer to entire datasets (as opposed to single variables) and multiple subscripts are used to specify specific data points
| Student |
Week 1 |
Week 2 |
Week 3 |
Week 4 |
Week 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
| 2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
| 3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
X24 = 3
X or Xij = 61
While distributions provide an overall picture of some dataset, it is sometimes desirable to represent the entire dataset using descriptive statistics
The first descriptive statistics we will discuss, are those used to indicate where the centre of the distribution lies
There are, in fact, three different measures of central tendency
The first of these is called the mode
The mode is simply the value of the relevant variable that occurs most often (i.e., has the highest frequency) in the sample
Note that if you have done a frequency histogram, you can often identify the mode simply by finding the value with the highest bar
However, that will not work when grouping was performed prior to plotting the histogram (although you can still use the histogram to identify the modal group, just not the modal value).
Create a nongrouped frequency table as described previously, then identify the value with the greatest frequency
For Example: Class Height
| Value |
Frequency |
Value |
Frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
3 |
69 |
3 |
| 62 |
4 |
70 |
2 |
| 63 |
4 |
71 |
4 |
| 64 |
4 |
72 |
4 |
| 65 |
3 |
73 |
0 |
| 66 |
7 |
74 |
0 |
| 67 |
5 |
75 |
0 |
| 68 |
4 |
76 |
1 |
A second measure of central tendency is called the median
The median is the point corresponding to the score that lies in the middle of the distribution (i.e., there are as many data points above the median as there are below the median)
To find the median, the data points must first be sorted into either ascending or descending numerical order
The position of the median value can then be calculated using the following Formula:
For Examples:
The median is the item in the fifth position of the ordered dataset, therefore the median is 4
Finally, the most commonly used measure of central tendency is called the
mean (denoted 
for a sample, and 
for a population)
The mean is the same of what most of us call the average, and it is calculated in the following manner:
For example, given the dataset that we used to calculate the median (odd number example), the corresponding mean would be:
Similarly, the mean height of our class, as indicated by our sample, is:
Mode vs. Median vs. Mean In our height example, the mode and median were the same, and the mean was fairly close to the mode and median. This was the case because the height distribution was fairly symetrical However, when the underlying distribution is not symetrical, the three measures of central tendency can be quite different
This raises the issue of which measure is best?
Example: Pizza Eating
| Value |
Frequency |
Value |
Frequency |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
4 |
8 |
5 |
| 1 |
2 |
10 |
2 |
| 2 |
8 |
15 |
1 |
| 3 |
6 |
16 |
1 |
| 4 |
6 |
20 |
1 |
| 5 |
6 |
40 |
1 |
| 6 |
5 |
- |
- |
Mode = 2 slices per week
Median = 4 slices per week
Mean = 5.7 slices per week
Note that if you were calculating these values, you would show all your steps (it's good to be prof!)
In addition to knowing where the centre of the distribution is, it is often helpful to know the degree to which individual values cluster around the centre. This is known as variability. There are various measures of variability, the most straightforward beingthe range of the sample:
Highest value minus lowest value
While range provides a good first pass at variance, it is not the best measure because of its sensitivity to extreme scores (see section in text)
Another approach to estimating variance is to directly measure the degree to which individual datapoints differ from the mean and then average those deviations
However, if we try to do this with real data, the result will always be zero:
Example: (2,3,4,4,4,5,6,12)
One way to get around the problem with the average deviation is to use the absolute value of the differences, instead of the differences themselves
The absolute value of some number is just the number without any sign:
Thus, we could re-write and solve our average deviation question as follows:
The dataset in question has a mean of 5 and a mean absolute deviation of
2
Although the MAD is an acceptable measure of variability, the most commonly
used measure is variance (denoted s2 for a sample and
for a population)
and its square root termed the standard deviation (denoted s for a
sample and 
for a
population)
The computation of variance is also based on the basic notion of the average deviation however, instead of getting around the "zero problem" by using absolute deviations (as in MAD), the "zero problem" is eliminating by squaring the differences from the mean
Specifically:
Example: Same old numbers
The definitional formula of variance just presented was:
An equivalent formula that is easier to work with when calculating variances
by hand is:
Although this second formula may look more intimidating, a few examples will
show you that it is actually easier to work with (as you'll See in assignment
2)
So, the mean 
and
variance (s2) are the descriptive statistics that are most commonly
used to represent the datapoints of some sample
The real reason that they are the preferred measures of central tendency
and variance is because of certain properties they have as estimators of
their corresponding population parameters;
and
Four properties are considered desirable in a population estimator; sufficiency, unbiasedness, efficiency, & resistance
Both the mean and the variance are the best estimators in their class in terms of the first three of these four properties
A sufficient statistic is one that makes use of all of the information in the sample to estimate its corresponding parameter
A statistic is said to be an unbiased estimator if its expected value (i.e., the mean of a number of sample means) is equal to the population parameter
- Explanation of N-1 in s2 formula
The efficiency of a statistic is reflected in the variance that is observed when one examines the means of a bunch of independently chosen samples
The bias of a statistic as an estimator of some population parameter can be assessed by
Using the procedure, the mean can be shown to be an unbiased estimator (see pp 47)
However, if the more intuitive formula for s2 is used:
it turns out to underestimate
This bias to underestimate is caused by the act of sampling and it can be shown that this bias can be eliminated if N-1 is used in the denominator instead of N
Note that this is only true when calculating s2, if you have a
measurable population and you want to calculate
, you use N in
the denominator, not N-1
The mean of 6, 8, & 10 is 8
If I allow you to change as many of these numbers as you want BUT the mean must stay 8, how many of the numbers are you free to vary?
The point of this exercise is that when the mean is fixed, it removes a degree of freedom from your sample -- this is like actually subtracting 1 from the number of observations in your sample
It is for exactly this reason that we use N-1 in the denominator when we calculate s2 (i.e., the calculation requires that the mean be fixed first which effectively removes -- fixes -- one of the data points)
The resistance of an estimator refers to the degree to which that estimate is effected by extreme values
As mentioned previously, both
and s2 are highly
sensitive to extreme values
Despite this, they are still the most commonly used estimates of the corresponding population parameters, mostly because of their superiority over other measures in terms sufficiency, unbiasedness, & efficiency
